<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
         xmlns:err="http://jelix.org/ns/xmlerror/1.0">
 <channel>

		<link rel="hub" href="http://overblog.superfeedr.com" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" />
		<link rel="self" href="http://www.ph-v.net/rss-articles.xml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" />
	
    <title><![CDATA[Le blog sécurité de Philippe Vialle / Phil Vialle's blog]]></title>
    <link>http://www.ph-v.net/</link>
    <description>Web blog d'un ingénieur en sécurité informatique.
IT Security watcher's blog: news, threats analysis, AV issues, PoC, IT security, bugs...
Contact: philippe.vialle@wanadoo.fr</description>

        <language>fr</language>
    
    
    <pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2012 06:02:53 +0100</pubDate>    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2012 06:02:53 +0100</lastBuildDate>    <generator>Over-blog.com RSS 2.0 Engine</generator>    <copyright>Copyright 2012 www.ph-v.net</copyright>            <category>Hi Tech</category>    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification/</docs>                        
      <item>
        <title><![CDATA[old versions of Firefox/Thunderbird left over... at risk!]]></title>
        <link>http://www.ph-v.net/article-old-versions-of-firefox-left-over-at-risk-98481626.html</link>        <description><![CDATA[						<img class="imgExtraitCon" src="http://img.over-blog.com/100x100/2/09/43/04/dossier1/firefox3_MaJ_HS_1_020212.JPG" alt="" />
				<br />
	Let's say that you start an old box, even a WinXP... that had not been used for a while. Because you're aware of security risks if you don't update your software, you try to update the whole stuff. Windows Updates works like a charm, and may deploy 100 updates with 1 or 2 reboots, okay fine.[...]]]></description>
        <pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 23:58:00 +0100</pubDate>        <guid isPermaLink="false">13724415fec8bc44bea6a4eb2bb915b4</guid>
                        <comments>http://www.ph-v.net/article-old-versions-of-firefox-left-over-at-risk-98481626-comments.html#anchorComment</comments>                    </item>
      <item>
        <title><![CDATA[Antivirus dans le nuage... pour de bon ?]]></title>
        <link>http://www.ph-v.net/article-antivirus-dans-le-nuage-pour-de-bon-98481318.html</link>        <description><![CDATA[	Un antivirus est censé protéger contre un maximum de menaces, oui... surtout dans le nuage, avec toutes les problématiques de cela pose. Hé bien là, non, dans le nuage, la protection ne joue pas... Trève de plaisanterie... je me demande par contre comment est estimé le nombre de menaces contre[...]]]></description>
        <pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 23:48:00 +0100</pubDate>        <guid isPermaLink="false">a00ebbd70d5bc6becf43da3c7b729823</guid>
                        <comments>http://www.ph-v.net/article-antivirus-dans-le-nuage-pour-de-bon-98481318-comments.html#anchorComment</comments>                    </item>
      <item>
        <title><![CDATA[Nouveau webmail de Free, ancienne version de PHP...]]></title>
        <link>http://www.ph-v.net/article-nouveau-webmail-de-free-ancienne-version-de-php-97566299.html</link>        <description><![CDATA[						<img class="imgExtraitCon" src="http://img.over-blog.com/100x100/2/09/43/04/dossier1/pub_zimbra_210112.PNG" alt="" />
				<br />
	Je ne dois pas être le seul à l'avoir vu, l'opérateur en fait l'annonce sur son portail dès l'instant que l'on rentre dans la partie "webmail"... Mais le problème est que l'infra Zimbra en question ne semble pas elle aussi neuve : D'après le site éditeur de PHP, cette version 5.2 n'est plus[...]]]></description>
        <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 23:37:00 +0100</pubDate>        <guid isPermaLink="false">bb1c63b905f5299d496dd6b496f7675d</guid>
                <category>Veille sécurité</category>        <comments>http://www.ph-v.net/article-nouveau-webmail-de-free-ancienne-version-de-php-97566299-comments.html#anchorComment</comments>                    </item>
      <item>
        <title><![CDATA[GTalk bot, leading users to porn-related ("dating") website]]></title>
        <link>http://www.ph-v.net/article-gtalk-bot-leading-users-to-porn-related-dating-website-97087350.html</link>        <description><![CDATA[						<img class="imgExtraitCon" src="http://img.over-blog.com/100x100/2/09/43/04/dossier1/capture_site_14012012.png" alt="" />
				<br />
	An old-fashion IM bot, but this time over GTalk... Here is the chat: loveflor3 hey whats up? 23/F here. youu? moi Sunny. Thx loveflor3 hmm. have we chattted before? moi Yes loveflor3 oh ok. l wasn't sure. anywayz.... whats up? 12:29 loveflor3 hello? 12:58 moi yes I'm having lunch loveflor3 im[...]]]></description>
        <pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 13:24:00 +0100</pubDate>        <guid isPermaLink="false">9dd37eb3a1d7065329e31ea0ee8ed14d</guid>
                <category>Veille sécurité</category>        <comments>http://www.ph-v.net/article-gtalk-bot-leading-users-to-porn-related-dating-website-97087350-comments.html#anchorComment</comments>                    </item>
      <item>
        <title><![CDATA[Android ad-ware case study]]></title>
        <link>http://www.ph-v.net/article-android-ad-ware-case-study-96838069.html</link>        <description><![CDATA[						<img class="imgExtraitCon" src="http://img.over-blog.com/100x100/2/09/43/04/dossier1/adware-heli-2012-01-11-005724-copie-1.png" alt="" />
				<br />
	I would believe we are back to Win 9x systems fashion, when adwares used to be legion (at least, in proportion compared to global threats trends at this time). But this case seems to concern any Android OS from 1.6 to 2.x, much more modern systems... In a nutshell, this adware will: - add an[...]]]></description>
        <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 01:12:00 +0100</pubDate>        <guid isPermaLink="false">38f61d9444b12bf66de42a6c167be6f2</guid>
                <category>Veille virale</category>        <comments>http://www.ph-v.net/article-android-ad-ware-case-study-96838069-comments.html#anchorComment</comments>                    </item>
      <item>
        <title><![CDATA[Facebook HTTPS certificate rollback?...]]></title>
        <link>http://www.ph-v.net/article-facebook-https-certificate-rollback-96634725.html</link>        <description><![CDATA[						<img class="imgExtraitCon" src="http://img.over-blog.com/100x100/2/09/43/04/dossier1/alert_certif_080112.jpg" alt="" />
				<br />
	A bit strange, isn't it, that alert from Certificate patrol? This came up while accessing Facebook with Firefox... Well, that would mean Facebook rolled back their HTTPS certificate, to re-use a former one, issued on November 2010... Why so? no real clue... How are we (professionals) supposed[...]]]></description>
        <pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 21:20:00 +0100</pubDate>        <guid isPermaLink="false">3732d23492ac440ef75999bdc3080de0</guid>
                <category>Veille sécurité</category>        <comments>http://www.ph-v.net/article-facebook-https-certificate-rollback-96634725-comments.html#anchorComment</comments>                    </item>
      <item>
        <title><![CDATA[Déni de service GMail]]></title>
        <link>http://www.ph-v.net/article-deni-de-service-gmail-96632856.html</link>        <description><![CDATA[						<img class="imgExtraitCon" src="http://img.over-blog.com/100x100/2/09/43/04/dossier1/GMail_HS_290411.JPG" alt="" />
				<br />
	Qui a dit que cela n'arrivait pas à tous les fournisseurs de service ? GMail ne fait pas exception à la règle. Bien que le Copyright sur la page date de 2008, le message lui, date bien de 2011 ! (je n'avais pas eu l'occasion de le poster). Attention donc à ceux qui veulent "mettre dans le[...]]]></description>
        <pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 20:49:00 +0100</pubDate>        <guid isPermaLink="false">4390af9b073c6ee0ba33dd1172901c92</guid>
                <category>Veille sécurité</category>        <comments>http://www.ph-v.net/article-deni-de-service-gmail-96632856-comments.html#anchorComment</comments>                    </item>
      <item>
        <title><![CDATA[Erreur de mise à jour Kaspersky, menant au plantage...]]></title>
        <link>http://www.ph-v.net/article-erreur-de-mise-a-jour-kaspersky-menant-au-plantage-96631536.html</link>        <description><![CDATA[						<img class="imgExtraitCon" src="http://img.over-blog.com/100x100/2/09/43/04/dossier1/info_KAV-copie-1.png" alt="" />
				<br />
	Il y a peu, en démarrant la machine, Kaspersky a affiché des avertissements et la session ne se chargeait plus correctement (pas complètement). Voici tout d'abord les infos de version du produit, pour savoir de quoi il est question : Ensuite, le message d'erreur proprement dit (apparu donc[...]]]></description>
        <pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 20:34:00 +0100</pubDate>        <guid isPermaLink="false">b3349d0adb74d94a13bd1c8cf97eecbb</guid>
                <category>Veille sécurité</category>        <comments>http://www.ph-v.net/article-erreur-de-mise-a-jour-kaspersky-menant-au-plantage-96631536-comments.html#anchorComment</comments>                    </item>
      <item>
        <title><![CDATA[Viadeo rappelé à l'ordre par Trusteer...]]></title>
        <link>http://www.ph-v.net/article-viadeo-rappele-a-l-ordre-par-trusteer-91720941.html</link>        <description><![CDATA[						<img class="imgExtraitCon" src="http://img.over-blog.com/100x100/2/09/43/04/dossier1/avertissement_Trusteer_061211.JPG" alt="" />
				<br />
	L'avertissement est, je pense, suffisamment explicite ! Mais où se cache le HTTPS ? Solution possible : utiliser HTTPS EveryWhere dans Firefox...]]></description>
        <pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 01:08:00 +0100</pubDate>        <guid isPermaLink="false">890379e1199575e21f5f5e52ea9a4f3f</guid>
                        <comments>http://www.ph-v.net/article-viadeo-rappele-a-l-ordre-par-trusteer-91720941-comments.html#anchorComment</comments>                    </item>
      <item>
        <title><![CDATA[New fake AV, spreading over email (GMail...)!]]></title>
        <link>http://www.ph-v.net/article-new-fake-av-spreading-over-email-gmail-91519923.html</link>        <description><![CDATA[						<img class="imgExtraitCon" src="http://img.over-blog.com/100x100/2/09/43/04/dossier1/msg_Gmail.JPG" alt="" />
				<br />
	First I thouht this was like regular spam, and something close to Viagra (and others...). But, in the end, no... The contact told me his "mail account" had been stolen, whereas I do believe his computer has been compromised (and then, the bad guys used that to gain access to the email[...]]]></description>
        <pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 21:55:00 +0100</pubDate>        <guid isPermaLink="false">f3bf7ed92af3e3fb98eb6106c4901299</guid>
                <category>Veille virale</category>        <comments>http://www.ph-v.net/article-new-fake-av-spreading-over-email-gmail-91519923-comments.html#anchorComment</comments>                    </item>
  
 </channel>

</rss>
